<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reasons I&#8217;ve Purchased a Gillette Fusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/</link>
	<description>Handcrafted pixels &#38; text from Salem, Massachusetts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Welt-Blick</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10006</link>
		<dc:creator>Welt-Blick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10006</guid>
		<description>I think 3 blades are more than enough.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think 3 blades are more than enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da Rude</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10005</link>
		<dc:creator>Da Rude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 17:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10005</guid>
		<description>First the mach 3.  That was pretty nice.  Then the quattro.  Ouch, not made by gillette means no good I assumed after trying the quatro, so i went back to the mach 3.  Now the fusion, even bigger ouch.  I think its made for shaving legs, not faces.  Anyways from my experiences the more blades, the more pain.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First the mach 3.  That was pretty nice.  Then the quattro.  Ouch, not made by gillette means no good I assumed after trying the quatro, so i went back to the mach 3.  Now the fusion, even bigger ouch.  I think its made for shaving legs, not faces.  Anyways from my experiences the more blades, the more pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martino</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10004</link>
		<dc:creator>martino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 18:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10004</guid>
		<description>mach 3 is good enough for a good shave and it does feel a bit sharp while using it, cant imagine wht a 5 blade razor would feel like, this is the funny part plus 1, he he
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mach 3 is good enough for a good shave and it does feel a bit sharp while using it, cant imagine wht a 5 blade razor would feel like, this is the funny part plus 1, he he</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10003</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:53:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10003</guid>
		<description>I have significant more skin irritation (razor burn) with the Fusion.  Anybody else cut themselves easier?  More blades closer together is not an advantage.  I&#039;m going back to my M3.  I drive one, might as well shave with one.
There has to be an equilibrium between the amount of blades used and the best shave possible.  The answer is no less than three and no more than four.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have significant more skin irritation (razor burn) with the Fusion.  Anybody else cut themselves easier?  More blades closer together is not an advantage.  I&#8217;m going back to my M3.  I drive one, might as well shave with one.<br />
There has to be an equilibrium between the amount of blades used and the best shave possible.  The answer is no less than three and no more than four.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big dog</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10002</link>
		<dc:creator>big dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 02:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10002</guid>
		<description>Yup! Mach 30 as featured on SNL.. should be out soon!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup! Mach 30 as featured on SNL.. should be out soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Griff</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10001</link>
		<dc:creator>Griff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 04:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10001</guid>
		<description>I must say, I think this is out of hand.  I switched to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.classicshaving.com/catalog/item/522941/343040.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;nice regular razor&lt;/a&gt; a few years ago.  One blade (cost of $.15 - .34 ea, that is fifteen to thirty-four CENTS) lasts me up to two weeks, shaving everyday.  As opposed to the Gillette multi-blade razors (that cost $1.50 per blade) which only last me two days at best.  And NO MORE Razor Burn!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must say, I think this is out of hand.  I switched to a <a href="http://www.classicshaving.com/catalog/item/522941/343040.htm" rel="nofollow">nice regular razor</a> a few years ago.  One blade (cost of $.15 &#8211; .34 ea, that is fifteen to thirty-four CENTS) lasts me up to two weeks, shaving everyday.  As opposed to the Gillette multi-blade razors (that cost $1.50 per blade) which only last me two days at best.  And NO MORE Razor Burn!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunnar</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10000</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunnar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-10000</guid>
		<description>A Moore&#039;s law for razors?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5624861&quot; title=&quot;Link to the Economist&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Read this!&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Moore&#8217;s law for razors?<br />
<a href="http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=5624861" title="Link to the Economist" rel="nofollow">Read this!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil G</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-9999</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2006 05:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-9999</guid>
		<description>hmmm 5 + 1 to do the job that just one used to do. Are blades becoming lazier?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm 5 + 1 to do the job that just one used to do. Are blades becoming lazier?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zachary Jones</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-9998</link>
		<dc:creator>Zachary Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 05:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-9998</guid>
		<description>The commercials also seem to try to convince you that if you use their razor, attractive women will appear out of nowhere and have an infatuation with trying to touch your face.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The commercials also seem to try to convince you that if you use their razor, attractive women will appear out of nowhere and have an infatuation with trying to touch your face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John C. Aldrich</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-9997</link>
		<dc:creator>John C. Aldrich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 02:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2006/02/24/confusion/#comment-9997</guid>
		<description>I just graduated from Basic Training for  the US Army and I&#039;ve been using the Fusion Power for almost a month.  I used the Mach 3 prior to switching to the Fusion Power.  About three times a week the Drill Seargents would do a &quot;shave check&quot; on the platoon, and I was usually one of the individuals that got harrassed ( up until I switched to the Fusion ).  I&#039;m my mind it&#039;s simply the better shaver.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just graduated from Basic Training for  the US Army and I&#8217;ve been using the Fusion Power for almost a month.  I used the Mach 3 prior to switching to the Fusion Power.  About three times a week the Drill Seargents would do a &#8220;shave check&#8221; on the platoon, and I was usually one of the individuals that got harrassed ( up until I switched to the Fusion ).  I&#8217;m my mind it&#8217;s simply the better shaver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

