<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reality Checkout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/</link>
	<description>Handcrafted pixels &#38; text from Salem, Massachusetts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sido</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4504</link>
		<dc:creator>Sido</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 04:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4504</guid>
		<description>15 reasons why MS owns apple: http://ifaq.wap.org/computers/msownsapple.html
CHECK IT OUT
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>15 reasons why MS owns apple: <a href="http://ifaq.wap.org/computers/msownsapple.html" rel="nofollow">http://ifaq.wap.org/computers/msownsapple.html</a><br />
CHECK IT OUT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 16</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4503</link>
		<dc:creator>16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4503</guid>
		<description>Would be dangerous to rely on the credits to a movie for current information.
MS owns zero percent of Apple
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would be dangerous to rely on the credits to a movie for current information.<br />
MS owns zero percent of Apple</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Str33tplayer</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4502</link>
		<dc:creator>Str33tplayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 22:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4502</guid>
		<description>at the end of &quot;Pirates Of Silicon Valley&quot; movie on Steve and Bill it does say:
&quot;Microsoft now owns part of Apple&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>at the end of &#8220;Pirates Of Silicon Valley&#8221; movie on Steve and Bill it does say:<br />
&#8220;Microsoft now owns part of Apple&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lbw</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4501</link>
		<dc:creator>lbw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Aug 2005 21:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4501</guid>
		<description>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/11/AR2005081102048.html
another example of why apple will always be second to M$
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/11/AR2005081102048.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/11/AR2005081102048.html</a><br />
another example of why apple will always be second to M$</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geir Werner</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4500</link>
		<dc:creator>Geir Werner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2005 11:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4500</guid>
		<description>Mark ; you´re right. Theonly reason Microsoft HAD to support Apple was to avoid Apples bankrupcy. That would  be a big problrm for M$. Gates is a briliant chessplayer, but a visionary he has never been.Remember his book &quot;The road ahead&quot; published in 1997 ? It didn´t mention the internet as an importarnt area in the futuretechnoly landscape !!  Of course in the next editiions they put more and more in.  Thats the difference between a visionary and a revisionary. Gates and Jobs - who is who ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark ; you´re right. Theonly reason Microsoft HAD to support Apple was to avoid Apples bankrupcy. That would  be a big problrm for M$. Gates is a briliant chessplayer, but a visionary he has never been.Remember his book &#8220;The road ahead&#8221; published in 1997 ? It didn´t mention the internet as an importarnt area in the futuretechnoly landscape !!  Of course in the next editiions they put more and more in.  Thats the difference between a visionary and a revisionary. Gates and Jobs &#8211; who is who ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4499</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2005 11:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4499</guid>
		<description>As far as I understand it Microsoft had to put some money into Apple to keep Apple alive.  Otherwise Microsoft would have been in trouble for having too much of the market.
Apple has now bought out Bill Gates I think.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I understand it Microsoft had to put some money into Apple to keep Apple alive.  Otherwise Microsoft would have been in trouble for having too much of the market.<br />
Apple has now bought out Bill Gates I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4498</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 11:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4498</guid>
		<description>&quot;In other words, Microsoft owns 18.2 million shares&quot;
Funny, Microsoft is not even on the radar of largest stock holders.
What you miss in your report is that Microsoft converted the preferred stocks AND SOLD THEM at a big profit.
The original agreement was that MS could not convert the preferred stocks and sell for 3 years, a deal which expired in 2000. In 2000 they converted AND SOLD.
Capish?
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=aapl
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In other words, Microsoft owns 18.2 million shares&#8221;<br />
Funny, Microsoft is not even on the radar of largest stock holders.<br />
What you miss in your report is that Microsoft converted the preferred stocks AND SOLD THEM at a big profit.<br />
The original agreement was that MS could not convert the preferred stocks and sell for 3 years, a deal which expired in 2000. In 2000 they converted AND SOLD.<br />
Capish?<br />
<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=aapl" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/q/mh?s=aapl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Macías</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4497</link>
		<dc:creator>John Macías</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 14:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4497</guid>
		<description>From Apple&#039;s 2003 SEC filing:
&quot;In August 1997, the Company and Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) entered into patent cross license and technology agreements. In addition, Microsoft purchased 150,000 shares of Apple Series A nonvoting convertible preferred stock (&quot;preferred stock&quot;) for $150 million. These shares were convertible by Microsoft after August 5, 2000, into shares of the Company&#039;s common stock at a conversion price of $8.25 per share. During 2000, 74,250 shares of preferred stock were converted to 9 million shares of the Company&#039;s common stock. During 2001, the remaining 75,750 preferred shares were converted into 9.2 million shares of the Company&#039;s common stock.&quot;
In other words, Microsoft owns 18.2 million shares of VOTING common stock in Apple Computer
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Apple&#8217;s 2003 SEC filing:<br />
&#8220;In August 1997, the Company and Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft) entered into patent cross license and technology agreements. In addition, Microsoft purchased 150,000 shares of Apple Series A nonvoting convertible preferred stock (&#8220;preferred stock&#8221;) for $150 million. These shares were convertible by Microsoft after August 5, 2000, into shares of the Company&#8217;s common stock at a conversion price of $8.25 per share. During 2000, 74,250 shares of preferred stock were converted to 9 million shares of the Company&#8217;s common stock. During 2001, the remaining 75,750 preferred shares were converted into 9.2 million shares of the Company&#8217;s common stock.&#8221;<br />
In other words, Microsoft owns 18.2 million shares of VOTING common stock in Apple Computer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taramon</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4496</link>
		<dc:creator>Taramon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 23:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4496</guid>
		<description>ACtually we will all be owned by WalMart in the end....
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACtually we will all be owned by WalMart in the end&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mahalis</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4495</link>
		<dc:creator>Mahalis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2004 23:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/08/10/apple/#comment-4495</guid>
		<description>&quot;no doubt, mac users are smart, witty, and charming; pc users are complete idiots&quot;; blacks are thugs; asians are workaholics; indians are restaurant owners..
Do you really -believe- your own generalizations or are you just trolling?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;no doubt, mac users are smart, witty, and charming; pc users are complete idiots&#8221;; blacks are thugs; asians are workaholics; indians are restaurant owners..<br />
Do you really -believe- your own generalizations or are you just trolling?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

