<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes, A House of Cards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/</link>
	<description>Handcrafted pixels &#38; text from Salem, Massachusetts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Buchs</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2719</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Buchs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2004 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2719</guid>
		<description>27 comments and only one about Journey? Come one, people...
If anyone hasn&#039;t seen &quot;VH1 Behind The Music - Journey&quot;, well, you haven&#039;t lived. Best. Episode. Ever. Those guys *hate* each other now.
Anywho, I agree with your point on alloting extra time for x-browser debugging - it&#039;s so easy to under-estimate the time it&#039;s really going to take to get it done. Right.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>27 comments and only one about Journey? Come one, people&#8230;<br />
If anyone hasn&#8217;t seen &#8220;VH1 Behind The Music &#8211; Journey&#8221;, well, you haven&#8217;t lived. Best. Episode. Ever. Those guys *hate* each other now.<br />
Anywho, I agree with your point on alloting extra time for x-browser debugging &#8211; it&#8217;s so easy to under-estimate the time it&#8217;s really going to take to get it done. Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: luis fernandes</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>luis fernandes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 23:40:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>What we need is an interactive  CSS debugger that allows us to single-step through each application of the css rules and allows us to stop at the exact css rule that is the cause of all that anxiety, grief and hair-loss.
I don&#039;t know, nor can I imagine the interface of such a debugger or how this would work but once someone writes a prototype css debugger we can all suggest improvements.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we need is an interactive  CSS debugger that allows us to single-step through each application of the css rules and allows us to stop at the exact css rule that is the cause of all that anxiety, grief and hair-loss.<br />
I don&#8217;t know, nor can I imagine the interface of such a debugger or how this would work but once someone writes a prototype css debugger we can all suggest improvements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CodeBitch</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2717</link>
		<dc:creator>CodeBitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2717</guid>
		<description>There are comprehensive lists of known bugs for many browsers, eg &lt;a href=&quot;http://positioniseverything.net/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Big John&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; for IE/Windows and mine for IE5/Mac, at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macedition.com/cb/ie5macbugs/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MacEdition&lt;/a&gt;. I can&#039;t tell from your description if the bug you encountered is already documented there, but it could be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macedition.com/cb/ie5macbugs/#relposbug&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are comprehensive lists of known bugs for many browsers, eg <a href="http://positioniseverything.net/" rel="nofollow">Big John&#8217;s</a> for IE/Windows and mine for IE5/Mac, at <a href="http://www.macedition.com/cb/ie5macbugs/" rel="nofollow">MacEdition</a>. I can&#8217;t tell from your description if the bug you encountered is already documented there, but it could be <a href="http://www.macedition.com/cb/ie5macbugs/#relposbug" rel="nofollow">this one</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tlack</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2716</link>
		<dc:creator>tlack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 05:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2716</guid>
		<description>Wow, it must be nice to have clients that can pay you for five or ten hours of layout on a single, simplistic HTML page. Usually when I get to the point of frustration mentioned in this post I just tear out the CSS layout code and make it a table with CSS for cell styling. And you know what? I almost always get it perfect the first time. They suck but they work.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, it must be nice to have clients that can pay you for five or ten hours of layout on a single, simplistic HTML page. Usually when I get to the point of frustration mentioned in this post I just tear out the CSS layout code and make it a table with CSS for cell styling. And you know what? I almost always get it perfect the first time. They suck but they work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>Had the same problem with position:relative also. In my case worked O.K. on Mac IE 5.x but on PC IE 5.x, I wasn&#039;t able to resize my table without causing the computer to freeze up. I replaced it with width:100%; and all was well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the same problem with position:relative also. In my case worked O.K. on Mac IE 5.x but on PC IE 5.x, I wasn&#8217;t able to resize my table without causing the computer to freeze up. I replaced it with width:100%; and all was well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2714</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2004 10:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2714</guid>
		<description>Only two things matter: The KISS Principle and Somebody Else&#039;s Advice
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only two things matter: The KISS Principle and Somebody Else&#8217;s Advice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2004 00:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>Hmmm...there is a turkey about the &lt;code&gt;position:relative&lt;/code&gt; syntax in IE/Mac, maybe in IE across the board, that may have been the culprit.
You mentioned you tried the obvious and non-obvious. Did you investigate z-index? Use of &lt;code&gt;position:relative&lt;/code&gt; allows the use of z-index in IE. The default behavior of z-index may be at fault. If you had not explicitly placed your element in z-index stack, you may be able to see the elements (possibly through a transparent background) but not interact with them. I have recently learned that not knowing what the default behaviors of code might be can lead to hair pulling scenarios of &quot;WHY!?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230;there is a turkey about the <code>position:relative</code> syntax in IE/Mac, maybe in IE across the board, that may have been the culprit.<br />
You mentioned you tried the obvious and non-obvious. Did you investigate z-index? Use of <code>position:relative</code> allows the use of z-index in IE. The default behavior of z-index may be at fault. If you had not explicitly placed your element in z-index stack, you may be able to see the elements (possibly through a transparent background) but not interact with them. I have recently learned that not knowing what the default behaviors of code might be can lead to hair pulling scenarios of &#8220;WHY!?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dann Ryan</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Dann Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re telling me, I can&#039;t begin to express the number of hours I spent going through the CSS for my site just for the difference between IE/Mozilla/Netscape on my PC. I haven&#039;t even had the opportunity to touch it on a Mac, and I am definately dreading when that opportunity does arise.
The most frustrating part is when I get comments from people I know like &quot;Oh, thats your new site? Thats it? I don&#039;t see what the big deal is...&quot; Even other people I know in web design that completely write CSS off and are, for lack of a better word, tablewhores.
The stuff that CSS can accomplish is amazing, but it doesn&#039;t come without its cost.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re telling me, I can&#8217;t begin to express the number of hours I spent going through the CSS for my site just for the difference between IE/Mozilla/Netscape on my PC. I haven&#8217;t even had the opportunity to touch it on a Mac, and I am definately dreading when that opportunity does arise.<br />
The most frustrating part is when I get comments from people I know like &#8220;Oh, thats your new site? Thats it? I don&#8217;t see what the big deal is&#8230;&#8221; Even other people I know in web design that completely write CSS off and are, for lack of a better word, tablewhores.<br />
The stuff that CSS can accomplish is amazing, but it doesn&#8217;t come without its cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Boggs</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2711</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Boggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 17:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2711</guid>
		<description>I literally found out about CSS in January in a class I&#039;m taking in grad school, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archiva.net/clio2/hist697course.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Creating History in New Media&lt;/a&gt;.  CSS is amazing stuff, and I&#039;m so thankful that I&#039;ve found it, but the countless hours doing things that Dan is talking about here is not unlike reading about 6 books a week (which is fairly typical in a history grad program, my experience in my MA program anyways).  I actually messed around with a problem for the past 4 days for one of my &lt;a href=&quot;http://mason.gmu.edu/~jboggs/openseason/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;assignments&lt;/a&gt;, which I haven&#039;t completely solved.
Because it&#039;s so new for all of us in class, and because we&#039;re all historians in the class, I&#039;m really suprised (and proud) that most of us have learned to use it somewhat efficiently.  In most history grad programs students are taught how to &quot;shred&quot; through books quickly to get at the main arguments, so tackling CSS and working with it hours on end is a whole new world for us.  In the long run, CSS will make (in my opinion) working with History and New Media much easier and rewarding.  I&#039;m sold on the virtues of CSS; now I&#039;m just trying to become as proficient with it as most of the people who post here...if that&#039;s even remotely possible!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I literally found out about CSS in January in a class I&#8217;m taking in grad school, <a href="http://www.archiva.net/clio2/hist697course.htm" rel="nofollow">Creating History in New Media</a>.  CSS is amazing stuff, and I&#8217;m so thankful that I&#8217;ve found it, but the countless hours doing things that Dan is talking about here is not unlike reading about 6 books a week (which is fairly typical in a history grad program, my experience in my MA program anyways).  I actually messed around with a problem for the past 4 days for one of my <a href="http://mason.gmu.edu/~jboggs/openseason/index.html" rel="nofollow">assignments</a>, which I haven&#8217;t completely solved.<br />
Because it&#8217;s so new for all of us in class, and because we&#8217;re all historians in the class, I&#8217;m really suprised (and proud) that most of us have learned to use it somewhat efficiently.  In most history grad programs students are taught how to &#8220;shred&#8221; through books quickly to get at the main arguments, so tackling CSS and working with it hours on end is a whole new world for us.  In the long run, CSS will make (in my opinion) working with History and New Media much easier and rewarding.  I&#8217;m sold on the virtues of CSS; now I&#8217;m just trying to become as proficient with it as most of the people who post here&#8230;if that&#8217;s even remotely possible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bo Salisbury</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Salisbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2004 08:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2004/04/14/cards/#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>Back before you folks were probably born, I remember seeing a handmade poster on a telephone pole in East Los Angeles, advertising the first area show of a new supergroup, Journey, playing at the Whiskey-A-Go-Go on Sunset Blvd. My friends and I were big fans of Neal Schon and Aynsley Dunbar (from the Mothers), so we were practically the first in line. What a show that was! Neil and Aynsley were joined by Ross Valory, Gregg Rolie and a rhythm guitarist / vocalist named George Tickner, who later went on to become a physician or something.
Anyways, I&#039;m an old duffer, so when I&#039;m having trouble I have to shift to chorale music or some ambient stuff (Aphex Twin) or some older Miles Davis or absolute silence. When things are going well, then it&#039;s happy punk or trance or the 77&#039;s.
Where would design be without music?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back before you folks were probably born, I remember seeing a handmade poster on a telephone pole in East Los Angeles, advertising the first area show of a new supergroup, Journey, playing at the Whiskey-A-Go-Go on Sunset Blvd. My friends and I were big fans of Neal Schon and Aynsley Dunbar (from the Mothers), so we were practically the first in line. What a show that was! Neil and Aynsley were joined by Ross Valory, Gregg Rolie and a rhythm guitarist / vocalist named George Tickner, who later went on to become a physician or something.<br />
Anyways, I&#8217;m an old duffer, so when I&#8217;m having trouble I have to shift to chorale music or some ambient stuff (Aphex Twin) or some older Miles Davis or absolute silence. When things are going well, then it&#8217;s happy punk or trance or the 77&#8242;s.<br />
Where would design be without music?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

