<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panther Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/</link>
	<description>Handcrafted pixels &#38; text from Salem, Massachusetts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:15:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malic</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>Malic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 21:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>Panther is slick on my Summer of 2000 iMac DV - 500Mhz/1G RAM - I got about %5+ overall increase on performance according to XBench.
But I do agree about the Aqua/Brushed metal thing.  Someone in Apple has more say than they should in such things.  The brushed metal look of the iLife apps is...ok, I suppose.  But the Finder shouldn&#039;t have gotten the treatment.
The one thing STILL not dealt with is the &quot;iSub not waking from sleep consistently&quot; problem!!!  I don&#039;t care if they discontinue the thing (why?!), this should be fixed!!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Panther is slick on my Summer of 2000 iMac DV &#8211; 500Mhz/1G RAM &#8211; I got about %5+ overall increase on performance according to XBench.<br />
But I do agree about the Aqua/Brushed metal thing.  Someone in Apple has more say than they should in such things.  The brushed metal look of the iLife apps is&#8230;ok, I suppose.  But the Finder shouldn&#8217;t have gotten the treatment.<br />
The one thing STILL not dealt with is the &#8220;iSub not waking from sleep consistently&#8221; problem!!!  I don&#8217;t care if they discontinue the thing (why?!), this should be fixed!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eric</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1283</link>
		<dc:creator>eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 19:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1283</guid>
		<description>On this site, at least, paragraphs are justified - messing with the whitespace of Verdana; maybe this is what you&#039;re seeing? I personally haven&#039;t seen any variations between my PC and my iBook.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this site, at least, paragraphs are justified &#8211; messing with the whitespace of Verdana; maybe this is what you&#8217;re seeing? I personally haven&#8217;t seen any variations between my PC and my iBook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John W</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1282</link>
		<dc:creator>John W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1282</guid>
		<description>[re: ugly Lucida, ugly Verdana, bad anti-aliasing]
I too have left comments on other sites regarding Lucida Grande.
It is noticeably thinner. And yes, there a higher amount of anti-aliasing systemwide. To my eyes, it&#039;s downright blurry and unacceptable. What&#039;s more, the character spacing for Verdana seems to have changed. All you &quot;11px verdana&quot; style-ers watch out-- you&#039;re going to see huge rivers of whitespace open up in your content. It&#039;s not pretty at all.
I&#039;m still using a CRT (call me a dinosaur), but it&#039;s a high-end Sony with one of the finest dot pitches available. Maybe Panther is optimized for viewing on an LCD? I hope not.
What I know is this: Aqua wasn&#039;t a bad idea. But those who complained of &quot;a death of a 1000 cuts&quot; are going to start winning over more sympathizers. Brushed metal, drop shadows, glassy buttons, anti-aliasing to the hilt... I dunno-- it was all starting to look a little &quot;shlocky-but-acceptable&quot; to me, but with all these additional annoyances, I&#039;m beginning to wonder whether or not the whole look and feel of the OS is heading for the crapper. Let&#039;s just hope they introduce animated paper clips and doggies n 10.4!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[re: ugly Lucida, ugly Verdana, bad anti-aliasing]<br />
I too have left comments on other sites regarding Lucida Grande.<br />
It is noticeably thinner. And yes, there a higher amount of anti-aliasing systemwide. To my eyes, it&#8217;s downright blurry and unacceptable. What&#8217;s more, the character spacing for Verdana seems to have changed. All you &#8220;11px verdana&#8221; style-ers watch out&#8211; you&#8217;re going to see huge rivers of whitespace open up in your content. It&#8217;s not pretty at all.<br />
I&#8217;m still using a CRT (call me a dinosaur), but it&#8217;s a high-end Sony with one of the finest dot pitches available. Maybe Panther is optimized for viewing on an LCD? I hope not.<br />
What I know is this: Aqua wasn&#8217;t a bad idea. But those who complained of &#8220;a death of a 1000 cuts&#8221; are going to start winning over more sympathizers. Brushed metal, drop shadows, glassy buttons, anti-aliasing to the hilt&#8230; I dunno&#8211; it was all starting to look a little &#8220;shlocky-but-acceptable&#8221; to me, but with all these additional annoyances, I&#8217;m beginning to wonder whether or not the whole look and feel of the OS is heading for the crapper. Let&#8217;s just hope they introduce animated paper clips and doggies n 10.4!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre Leistner</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1281</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre Leistner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 09:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1281</guid>
		<description>[skinny Lucida Grande in Panther]
I don&#039;t think that Apple has changed Lucida Grande&#039;s font metrics – this would probably have too much impact on text placement in application dialogs etc. To me it rather looks that they&#039;ve modified the font rendering and anti-aliasing in order to improve readability on screen. Take a look at other fonts such as Times, especially at small sizes.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[skinny Lucida Grande in Panther]<br />
I don&#8217;t think that Apple has changed Lucida Grande&#8217;s font metrics – this would probably have too much impact on text placement in application dialogs etc. To me it rather looks that they&#8217;ve modified the font rendering and anti-aliasing in order to improve readability on screen. Take a look at other fonts such as Times, especially at small sizes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1280</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 23:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1280</guid>
		<description>also notice that the flash and shockwave performance within Safari 1.1 took a noticeable downturn for the worse. They had improved performance recently to the acceptable level, but now it is back below some of the early Safari beta levels. Poor.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also notice that the flash and shockwave performance within Safari 1.1 took a noticeable downturn for the worse. They had improved performance recently to the acceptable level, but now it is back below some of the early Safari beta levels. Poor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rik Abel</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Rik Abel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 12:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>Exposé is even yet still greater with a five-button mouse, as mentioned already. MASSIVE productivity aid- I don&#039;t just keep tiling the windows gratuitously because it is so cool. I would never do that.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exposé is even yet still greater with a five-button mouse, as mentioned already. MASSIVE productivity aid- I don&#8217;t just keep tiling the windows gratuitously because it is so cool. I would never do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 04:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t 10.2 and lower had shadows on Lucida? I could be mistaken.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn&#8217;t 10.2 and lower had shadows on Lucida? I could be mistaken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D.</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2003 00:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1277</guid>
		<description>Yes, I absolutely think it&#039;s weird to change the metrics of a font without calling it by a separate name (like, as you mention, Lucida Narrow).  I&#039;ve read a few posts on other boards today saying this issue might actually be related to the use of Extensis Suitcase under Panther.  I do use Suitcase but have been too lazy to disable it and see if things go back to normal.  Just another thing to think about.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I absolutely think it&#8217;s weird to change the metrics of a font without calling it by a separate name (like, as you mention, Lucida Narrow).  I&#8217;ve read a few posts on other boards today saying this issue might actually be related to the use of Extensis Suitcase under Panther.  I do use Suitcase but have been too lazy to disable it and see if things go back to normal.  Just another thing to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 23:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Fontbook has some problems.
I had a problem that simple crashed the launching of other system applications. Reinstall panther and again, when messing with font activation in fontbook, serious problems. I discovered that the problem was related with a file (com.apple.AST.plist) in the Preferences folder  that got corrupted somehow ... this file seems to have the information about active and desactive fonts managed by Fontbook.
To solve the problem I deleted the file and logged again. Problem solved... but i cannot trust Fontbook!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fontbook has some problems.<br />
I had a problem that simple crashed the launching of other system applications. Reinstall panther and again, when messing with font activation in fontbook, serious problems. I discovered that the problem was related with a file (com.apple.AST.plist) in the Preferences folder  that got corrupted somehow &#8230; this file seems to have the information about active and desactive fonts managed by Fontbook.<br />
To solve the problem I deleted the file and logged again. Problem solved&#8230; but i cannot trust Fontbook!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emyr</title>
		<link>http://simplebits.com/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>Emyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2003 21:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simplebits.com/wp/notebook/2003/11/03/panther-notes/#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>Re: enabling personal web pages with FileVault active
Try &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20031020155055182&amp;query=filevault&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this hint&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macosxhints.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mac OS X Hints&lt;/a&gt;.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: enabling personal web pages with FileVault active<br />
Try <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20031020155055182&#038;query=filevault" rel="nofollow">this hint</a> from <a href="http://www.macosxhints.com/" rel="nofollow">Mac OS X Hints</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

